BHAVESH NAVIN PARADHI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 61/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT120002462026

Filing Number

61/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, NALIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205017260007

Police Station

JAKHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESH NAVIN PARADHI

    Adv. P M GADHAVI

  2. 2.PUNSHI MEGHRAJ MIDHANI

    Adv. P M GADHAVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail application of two accused persons (Bhavesh Navin Pardhi and Punshi Medharaj Mindhani) charged under BNS sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), and 54 in a theft case involving Rs. 36,000. The court found the charges cognizable and non-bailable, and considering the serious nature of the crime, the rise in burglary and theft cases in Kutch district, and the risk of tampering with investigation, the bail plea was denied on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail application of two accused persons (Bhavesh Navin Pardhi and Punshi Medharaj Mindhani) charged under BNS sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), and 54 in a theft case involving Rs. 36,000. The court found the charges cognizable and non-bailable, and considering the serious nature of the crime, the rise in burglary and theft cases in Kutch district, and the risk of tampering with investigation, the bail plea was denied on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case