BHAVESH NAVIN PARADHI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 60/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT120002452026

Filing Number

60/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

60/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, NALIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205017250069

Police Station

JAKHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESH NAVIN PARADHI

    Adv. P M GADHAVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Naliya, Kutch, rejected the bail application of the accused Bhavesh Naveen Pardhi, who was charged under BNS sections 305(A), 331(3), and 331(4) for theft of Rs. 77,600. The court found the charges cognizable and non-bailable, noting the serious nature of the offense with potential imprisonment up to 14 years, and concluded that granting bail would adversely affect public order and encourage similar crimes in the region. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Naliya, Kutch, rejected the bail application of the accused Bhavesh Naveen Pardhi, who was charged under BNS sections 305(A), 331(3), and 331(4) for theft of Rs. 77,600. The court found the charges cognizable and non-bailable, noting the serious nature of the offense with potential imprisonment up to 14 years, and concluded that granting bail would adversely affect public order and encourage similar crimes in the region. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case