PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION vs SUBHASCHANDRA PARAMANAD PATRA — 87/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 01st April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJKT110115462025
Filing Number
87/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
87/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
33-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION
Adv. T H MEHTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUBHASCHANDRA PARAMANAD PATRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court disposed of the execution petition filed by PGVCL against Subhashchandra Parmanand Patra for want of the judgment debtor's correct address. Despite granting three adjournments and ample opportunities over five months, the decree holder failed to provide an updated address, making service impossible and preventing execution of the decree. Citing Supreme Court directions for expeditious disposal of execution petitions within six months, the court dismissed the petition without further adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jan-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2025
The court disposed of the execution petition filed by PGVCL against Subhashchandra Parmanand Patra for want of the judgment debtor's correct address. Despite granting three adjournments and ample opportunities over five months, the decree holder failed to provide an updated address, making service impossible and preventing execution of the decree. Citing Supreme Court directions for expeditious disposal of execution petitions within six months, the court dismissed the petition without further adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts