KUTCH BRINE CHEM INDUSTRIES THRU SHREE VATSAL ANILBHAI THAKKAR vs VERITAS OVERSEAS — 5823/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 20th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT110091192025

Filing Number

5823/2025

Filing Date

29-Sep-2025

Registration No

5823/2025

Registration Date

29-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

12-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

20-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUTCH BRINE CHEM INDUSTRIES THRU SHREE VATSAL ANILBHAI THAKKAR

    Adv. B J JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VERITAS OVERSEAS

  2. 2.ABDUSSALAM ABDULLALITIF MOMIN

  3. 3.VIJAYKUMAR KANTILAL SUDHA

  4. 4.BHARAT RAYSIBHAI SUDHA

    Adv. R G VISHWAKARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the petitioner's appeal after finding that the cheque amount had already been received by the respondent, making further proceedings unnecessary. The case was disposed of as the underlying cause of action no longer existed, with the court noting that since the monetary dispute was resolved, there was no basis to continue the legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 26-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 01-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5823/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the petitioner's appeal after finding that the cheque amount had already been received by the respondent, making further proceedings unnecessary. The case was disposed of as the underlying cause of action no longer existed, with the court noting that since the monetary dispute was resolved, there was no basis to continue the legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case