Government of Gujarat vs ROHIT SHAILESHBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A D PARMAR — 3859/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT110059732023
Filing Number
3859/2023
Filing Date
07-Jul-2023
Registration No
3859/2023
Registration Date
07-Jul-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
30-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993002230087
Police Station
ADIPUR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROHIT SHAILESHBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A D PARMAR
-
2.NAVIN BHAGWANBHAI ZALA
Adv. P M MAHESHWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Judegement
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the two accused of theft charges under IPC Section 379, 114, and 113. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt because the primary witness (the motorcycle owner) could not identify who stole the vehicle and testified that he had no knowledge of the theft. Without credible evidence linking the accused to the crime, the court found insufficient grounds for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 3859/2023
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the two accused of theft charges under IPC Section 379, 114, and 113. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt because the primary witness (the motorcycle owner) could not identify who stole the vehicle and testified that he had no knowledge of the theft. Without credible evidence linking the accused to the crime, the court found insufficient grounds for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts