PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs MURJI MURA MARAJ — 576/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 06th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT110051592025

Case disposed

Filing Number

576/2025

Filing Date

16-06-2025

Registration No

576/2025

Registration Date

16-06-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER

Adv. H N ASNANI

Respondent(s)

MURJI MURA MARAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

06-05-2026

Disposed

05-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

22-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity bills against defendant Murji Mura Maraj. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 12,944.49 (principal arrears) with interest at 6% per annum (instead of the claimed 15%) and Rs. 2,521.21 as delay payment charges, totaling Rs. 15,465.70. The court found the plaintiff's evidence credible based on documentary records and the deputy engineer's testimony, while the defendant failed to respond despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity bills against defendant Murji Mura Maraj. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 12,944.49 (principal arrears) with interest at 6% per annum (instead of the claimed 15%) and Rs. 2,521.21 as delay payment charges, totaling Rs. 15,465.70. The court found the plaintiff's evidence credible based on documentary records and the deputy engineer's testimony, while the defendant failed to respond despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case