PGVCL RAMBAUG SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs SHAKINABEN FAKIRMAMAD TARK — 559/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT110049872025
Filing Number
559/2025
Filing Date
10-06-2025
Registration No
559/2025
Registration Date
10-06-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL RAMBAUG SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER
Adv. H N ASNANI
Respondent(s)
SHAKINABEN FAKIRMAMAD TARK
Hearing History
Judge: 33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 19,672.20 (the principal amount for illegal electricity consumption) with 6% per annum interest from the date of suit filing. The court rejected the claimed delay payment charges of Rs. 6,506.12 for lack of proper documentation and reduced the requested interest rate from 15% to 6% per annum as unjustified by any agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 19,672.20 (the principal amount for illegal electricity consumption) with 6% per annum interest from the date of suit filing. The court rejected the claimed delay payment charges of Rs. 6,506.12 for lack of proper documentation and reduced the requested interest rate from 15% to 6% per annum as unjustified by any agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts