PGVCL - THROUGH DY. ENGINEER - RAMBAUG SUB DIVISION vs MANUBHAI AMRUTBHAI PARMAR — 550/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 06th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT110049082025

Case disposed

Filing Number

550/2025

Filing Date

10-06-2025

Registration No

550/2025

Registration Date

10-06-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL - THROUGH DY. ENGINEER - RAMBAUG SUB DIVISION

Adv. H N ASNANI

Respondent(s)

MANUBHAI AMRUTBHAI PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

06-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

22-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

08-04-2026

ISSUES

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery against the defendant. The court found that the defendant illegally consumed Rs.11,495.02 in electricity without authorization by bypassing the meter, and ordered him to pay this principal amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit filing. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's claim for Rs.4,642.57 in delayed payment charges and the requested 15% interest, deeming them inadequately substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery against the defendant. The court found that the defendant illegally consumed Rs.11,495.02 in electricity without authorization by bypassing the meter, and ordered him to pay this principal amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit filing. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's claim for Rs.4,642.57 in delayed payment charges and the requested 15% interest, deeming them inadequately substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case