PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs BHANUBEN SURESH DEVIPUJAK — 504/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 06th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT110041912025

Case disposed

Filing Number

504/2025

Filing Date

08-05-2025

Registration No

504/2025

Registration Date

08-05-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER

Adv. G V PARYANI

Respondent(s)

BHANUBEN SURESH DEVIPUJAK

Hearing History

Judge: 33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

06-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

22-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-04-2026

PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE

15-04-2026

ISSUES

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court partially allowed Paschim Gujarat Vij Company's (PGVCL) suit for electricity bill recovery against defendant Bhanuben Suresh Devipujak. The court found that the defendant illegally consumed Rs.18,321.59 worth of electricity by tampering with the meter and drawing unauthorized power, and ordered payment of this principal amount with 6% annual interest from the suit's filing date. However, the court rejected the demanded delay payment charges (Rs.5,086.88) and the 15% interest rate, finding insufficient justification for these claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed Paschim Gujarat Vij Company's (PGVCL) suit for electricity bill recovery against defendant Bhanuben Suresh Devipujak. The court found that the defendant illegally consumed Rs.18,321.59 worth of electricity by tampering with the meter and drawing unauthorized power, and ordered payment of this principal amount with 6% annual interest from the suit's filing date. However, the court rejected the demanded delay payment charges (Rs.5,086.88) and the 15% interest rate, finding insufficient justification for these claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case