PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION-THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs MAHESHVARI DAMYANTIBEN SHANKARLAL URFE SHANKARBHAI — 459/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 08th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT110039822025
Filing Number
459/2025
Filing Date
01-05-2025
Registration No
459/2025
Registration Date
01-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
32-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION-THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER
Adv. H N ASNANI
Respondent(s)
MAHESHVARI DAMYANTIBEN SHANKARLAL URFE SHANKARBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 32-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Gandhidham partially allowed Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.'s suit against the defendant for recovery of electricity theft arrears. The court found that the defendant illegally tampered with the service line and committed electricity theft, resulting in dues of Rs.35,457/-. The court awarded the full amount with interest at 6% per annum (instead of the claimed 15%) from the date of filing until realization, plus litigation costs against the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Gandhidham partially allowed Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.'s suit against the defendant for recovery of electricity theft arrears. The court found that the defendant illegally tampered with the service line and committed electricity theft, resulting in dues of Rs.35,457/-. The court awarded the full amount with interest at 6% per annum (instead of the claimed 15%) from the date of filing until realization, plus litigation costs against the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts