PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION-THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs KISHAN KARAMSHI VADHIYARA — 383/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 06th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT110036852025
Filing Number
383/2025
Filing Date
18-04-2025
Registration No
383/2025
Registration Date
18-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL GANDHIDHAM SUB DIVISION-THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER
Adv. H N ASNANI
Respondent(s)
KISHAN KARAMSHI VADHIYARA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 08-04-2026 | ISSUES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity charges against the defendant. The court found that the defendant had illegally consumed electricity by bypassing the meter without authorization, making him liable for Rs. 12,541.23 in principal charges. However, the court rejected the claim for Rs. 3,086.17 in delayed payment charges due to insufficient justification, and reduced the claimed 15% interest to 6% per annum, finding no contractual basis for the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity charges against the defendant. The court found that the defendant had illegally consumed electricity by bypassing the meter without authorization, making him liable for Rs. 12,541.23 in principal charges. However, the court rejected the claim for Rs. 3,086.17 in delayed payment charges due to insufficient justification, and reduced the claimed 15% interest to 6% per annum, finding no contractual basis for the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts