GOVIND BHURIYABHAI RAVAL vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 429/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT110025322026
Filing Number
429/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
429/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
12-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1199306250001
Police Station
GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVIND BHURIYABHAI RAVAL
Adv. H R PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the accused's plea to release land seized during a 30-day custody period in a criminal case. The court held that despite the accused's arguments regarding family hardship and financial need, the serious nature of the allegations—involving digital arrest, fake FIR lodging, and conspiracy—combined with the accused's criminal history and ongoing trial, justified denying bail and maintaining custody of the property as case evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 429/2026
Summary The court rejected the accused's plea to release land seized during a 30-day custody period in a criminal case. The court held that despite the accused's arguments regarding family hardship and financial need, the serious nature of the allegations—involving digital arrest, fake FIR lodging, and conspiracy—combined with the accused's criminal history and ongoing trial, justified denying bail and maintaining custody of the property as case evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts