SATYAPAL RAVINDRAPRASAD RAJGOR vs HDFC BANK LTD — 427/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT110024832026

Filing Number

427/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

427/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

12-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYAPAL RAVINDRAPRASAD RAJGOR

    Adv. M T AHIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted the accused's bail petition under Section 438 of the CrPC with stringent conditions, including a bond of Rs. 10,000 and an undertaking to appear regularly before the court. The accused is charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act with a maximum sentence of 2 years imprisonment, and the court balanced the severity of the offense, the accused's local residential status, and family responsibilities in granting bail with multiple conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the accused's bail petition under Section 438 of the CrPC with stringent conditions, including a bond of Rs. 10,000 and an undertaking to appear regularly before the court. The accused is charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act with a maximum sentence of 2 years imprisonment, and the court balanced the severity of the offense, the accused's local residential status, and family responsibilities in granting bail with multiple conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case