Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI DHARSHIBHAI DEVIPUJAK (JIJUVADIYA) — 1618/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294(B),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT110020372022
Filing Number
1618/2022
Filing Date
07-May-2022
Registration No
1618/2022
Registration Date
07-May-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
31-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
186
Police Station
GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHARATBHAI DHARSHIBHAI DEVIPUJAK (JIJUVADIYA)
-
2.RAJUBHAI LAXMANBHAI DEVIPUJAK
-
3.GANGABEN W/O RAJUBHAI DEVIPUJAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted three accused persons of charges under IPC Section 323/324/34 (voluntarily causing hurt) and IPC Section 135 (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence and credibility gaps in the prosecution's case. The court found that the complainant's testimony was contradictory regarding key facts, witness statements lacked corroboration, and the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jul-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Jun-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Mar-2023
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jan-2023
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Dec-2022
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Nov-2022
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Sep-2022
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 1618/2022
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted three accused persons of charges under IPC Section 323/324/34 (voluntarily causing hurt) and IPC Section 135 (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence and credibility gaps in the prosecution's case. The court found that the complainant's testimony was contradictory regarding key facts, witness statements lacked corroboration, and the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts