GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MAHMAD SAJID S/O NABI HUSHEN ANSARI Advocate - R T LALCHANDANI — 1185/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64,64(2)(M),351(2),351(3). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITAL on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT110019842026

Filing Number

1185/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

1185/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

12-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMMITAL

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993006260001

Police Station

GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64,64(2)(M),351(2),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHMAD SAJID S/O NABI HUSHEN ANSARI Advocate - R T LALCHANDANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Gandhinagar dismissed the criminal case filed under IPC sections 64, 64(2), 351(2), and 351(3) against the accused, finding insufficient evidence to proceed. The court ordered that the case be referred to the Sessions Court for appropriate action and directed that all records be forwarded to the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1185/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Gandhinagar dismissed the criminal case filed under IPC sections 64, 64(2), 351(2), and 351(3) against the accused, finding insufficient evidence to proceed. The court ordered that the case be referred to the Sessions Court for appropriate action and directed that all records be forwarded to the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case