PGVCL RAMBAUG SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs SODHA HAVABAI AMAD — 211/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT110017952025
Filing Number
211/2025
Filing Date
25-02-2025
Registration No
211/2025
Registration Date
25-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL RAMBAUG SUB DIVISION -THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER
Adv. G V PARYANI
Respondent(s)
SODHA HAVABAI AMAD
Hearing History
Judge: 33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
ISSUES
PUBLIC NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-04-2026 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE |
| 15-04-2026 | ISSUES |
| 11-03-2026 | PUBLIC NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity bills against the defendant, directing payment of Rs. 9,388.38 (principal) with 6% annual interest (reduced from the claimed 15%) and Rs. 3,846.50 in delay payment charges, totaling Rs. 13,234.88. The court found the defendant's unpaid bills substantiated through unchallenged company records and postal evidence of service, but rejected the 15% interest rate as unjustified for lack of documentary evidence supporting the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity bills against the defendant, directing payment of Rs. 9,388.38 (principal) with 6% annual interest (reduced from the claimed 15%) and Rs. 3,846.50 in delay payment charges, totaling Rs. 13,234.88. The court found the defendant's unpaid bills substantiated through unchallenged company records and postal evidence of service, but rejected the 15% interest rate as unjustified for lack of documentary evidence supporting the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts