RAVI MUNNA VADECHA (DEVIPUJAK) vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 358/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT110016362026
Filing Number
358/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
358/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993002260046
Police Station
ADIPUR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVI MUNNA VADECHA (DEVIPUJAK)
Adv. K D RATHOD
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 33-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 20-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized OPPO K 12 X mobile phone to the applicant, ruling that seized articles should not be retained at police stations for prolonged periods beyond 15 days to one month, citing Supreme Court precedent. The applicant must deposit 1½ times the mobile's value as surety and comply with conditions including ownership verification, non-transfer of the device, and production when required by the court or investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized OPPO K 12 X mobile phone to the applicant, ruling that seized articles should not be retained at police stations for prolonged periods beyond 15 days to one month, citing Supreme Court precedent. The applicant must deposit 1½ times the mobile's value as surety and comply with conditions including ownership verification, non-transfer of the device, and production when required by the court or investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts