VAGHAMSHI MAYUR RATILAL vs LALJI SHAMJI HETHVADIYA Advocate - S D GADHVI — 1466/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT100027802025
Filing Number
1466/2025
Filing Date
21-Aug-2025
Registration No
1466/2025
Registration Date
21-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
13-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VAGHAMSHI MAYUR RATILAL
Adv. A K BAMBHANIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.LALJI SHAMJI HETHVADIYA Advocate - S D GADHVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court ordered that the accused be acquitted under Section 280 of the IPC (Negligent Act) and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused did not intend to continue the work and rejected the claims, directing the case to be decided based on video evidence, resulting in acquittal from criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1466/2025
Summary The court ordered that the accused be acquitted under Section 280 of the IPC (Negligent Act) and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused did not intend to continue the work and rejected the claims, directing the case to be decided based on video evidence, resulting in acquittal from criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts