VAGHAMSHI MAYUR RATILAL vs LALJI SHAMJI HETHVADIYA Advocate - S D GADHVI — 1466/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT100027802025
Filing Number
1466/2025
Filing Date
21-08-2025
Registration No
1466/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VAGHAMSHI MAYUR RATILAL
Adv. A K BAMBHANIYA
Respondent(s)
LALJI SHAMJI HETHVADIYA Advocate - S D GADHVI
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court ordered that the accused be acquitted under Section 280 of the IPC (Negligent Act) and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused did not intend to continue the work and rejected the claims, directing the case to be decided based on video evidence, resulting in acquittal from criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court ordered that the accused be acquitted under Section 280 of the IPC (Negligent Act) and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused did not intend to continue the work and rejected the claims, directing the case to be decided based on video evidence, resulting in acquittal from criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts