THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GOVIND CHANABHAI HUMBAL Advocate - H J SONAPAR — 1355/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,440,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT100026612023
Filing Number
1355/2023
Filing Date
01-09-2023
Registration No
1355/2023
Registration Date
01-09-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
30085
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - CHHOTAUDEPUR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GOVIND CHANABHAI HUMBAL Advocate - H J SONAPAR
BHAVESH SANKAR HUMBAL
Adv. H J SONAPAR
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 03-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 10-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In this Gujarati criminal case (C.C. No. 1355/2023), the court acquitted two accused persons under IPC Sections 328, 504, 440, and 114 after finding insufficient evidence of the essential elements of the crimes alleged. The court found that while the accused were involved in breaking into a compound gate, the prosecution failed to prove charges of criminal intimidation and abetment, and noted that the main complainant's witness support was weak. The court ordered acquittal under IPC Section 248(1) for the aggravated offenses while allowing prosecution to proceed on the lesser offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Gujarati criminal case (C.C. No. 1355/2023), the court acquitted two accused persons under IPC Sections 328, 504, 440, and 114 after finding insufficient evidence of the essential elements of the crimes alleged. The court found that while the accused were involved in breaking into a compound gate, the prosecution failed to prove charges of criminal intimidation and abetment, and noted that the main complainant's witness support was weak. The court ordered acquittal under IPC Section 248(1) for the aggravated offenses while allowing prosecution to proceed on the lesser offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts