PIYUSH RASHIKLAL NATHANI vs DHANSHUKH JERAM HIRPARA Advocate - D K BAMBHANIYA — 209/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 06th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT100008832022
Filing Number
209/2022
Filing Date
12-04-2022
Registration No
209/2022
Registration Date
12-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PIYUSH RASHIKLAL NATHANI
Adv. K P SACHDE
Respondent(s)
DHANSHUKH JERAM HIRPARA Advocate - D K BAMBHANIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 11-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 23-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 09-12-2025 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for want of prosecution. The complainant failed to proceed with the case or make sincere efforts for service of process despite repeated adjournments, leading the court to invoke Section 256 of the CrPC to acquit the accused due to the complainant's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for want of prosecution. The complainant failed to proceed with the case or make sincere efforts for service of process despite repeated adjournments, leading the court to invoke Section 256 of the CrPC to acquit the accused due to the complainant's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts