THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs TARSHIBHAI BHIKHA KOLI Advocate - S D GADHVI — 377/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT100005942026

Filing Number

377/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

377/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANJAR

Judge

13-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993014260037

Police Station

DUDHAI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARSHIBHAI BHIKHA KOLI Advocate - S D GADHVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found accused Tarshbhai Bhikhabhai Koli guilty under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act on his voluntary plea of guilty. Considering mitigating circumstances including that this was his first offense, family responsibilities, and financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 377/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found accused Tarshbhai Bhikhabhai Koli guilty under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act on his voluntary plea of guilty. Considering mitigating circumstances including that this was his first offense, family responsibilities, and financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case