SUMAR MUSHABHAI JAT vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 126/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT100005722026
Filing Number
126/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993003260225
Police Station
ANJAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMAR MUSHABHAI JAT
Adv. G S SHEKH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Anjar dismissed the petitioner's application seeking return of seized animals (one buffalo and one calf) in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act case. The court found insufficient documentary evidence of the petitioner's ownership, as the gram panchayat certificate did not clearly establish the animals belonged to the petitioner. The court rejected return of the animals in the interest of justice, noting concerns about potential future cruelty if the animals were returned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Anjar dismissed the petitioner's application seeking return of seized animals (one buffalo and one calf) in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act case. The court found insufficient documentary evidence of the petitioner's ownership, as the gram panchayat certificate did not clearly establish the animals belonged to the petitioner. The court rejected return of the animals in the interest of justice, noting concerns about potential future cruelty if the animals were returned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts