NURMAMAD ISHAKBHAI JAT vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 124/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT100005702026
Filing Number
124/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
124/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993003260225
Police Station
ANJAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NURMAMAD ISHAKBHAI JAT
Adv. G S SHEKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Anjar, Kutch rejected the petitioner's application to recover two buffaloes seized as evidence in a case involving animal cruelty charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The court found insufficient documentary proof of the petitioner's ownership of the animals and held that returning the buffaloes to the petitioner would not be justified in the interests of justice, given the ongoing criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 124/2026
The Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Anjar, Kutch rejected the petitioner's application to recover two buffaloes seized as evidence in a case involving animal cruelty charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The court found insufficient documentary proof of the petitioner's ownership of the animals and held that returning the buffaloes to the petitioner would not be justified in the interests of justice, given the ongoing criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts