THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LAKHMAN VIRABHAI KOLI Advocate - S D GADHVI — 356/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT100005652026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

356/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANJAR

Judge

13-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993014260028

Police Station

DUDHAI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKHMAN VIRABHAI KOLI Advocate - S D GADHVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused Lakhmaan Virabhai Koli guilty under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act based on his voluntary confession. Considering it was his first offense, his poor financial condition, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the court rises and a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 356/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Lakhmaan Virabhai Koli guilty under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act based on his voluntary confession. Considering it was his first offense, his poor financial condition, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the court rises and a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case