MAHENDRA AAMAD JAT vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 121/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT100005232026
Filing Number
121/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
121/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993003260225
Police Station
ANJAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHENDRA AAMAD JAT
Adv. G S SHEKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court approved the petitioner's application to return his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration: GJ-12-BY-9391) used in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act case, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a bond, producing the vehicle as required by court, and maintaining it in original condition until case conclusion. The court relied on the Supreme Court's principle that seized property should not be kept with police for extended periods and ordered return with appropriate safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 121/2026
The court approved the petitioner's application to return his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration: GJ-12-BY-9391) used in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act case, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a bond, producing the vehicle as required by court, and maintaining it in original condition until case conclusion. The court relied on the Supreme Court's principle that seized property should not be kept with police for extended periods and ordered return with appropriate safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts