MAHENDRA AAMAD JAT vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 121/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT100005232026

Case disposed

Filing Number

121/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

121/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANJAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993003260225

Police Station

ANJAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

MAHENDRA AAMAD JAT

Adv. G S SHEKH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

20-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
ORDER

The court approved the petitioner's application to return his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration: GJ-12-BY-9391) used in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act case, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a bond, producing the vehicle as required by court, and maintaining it in original condition until case conclusion. The court relied on the Supreme Court's principle that seized property should not be kept with police for extended periods and ordered return with appropriate safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the petitioner's application to return his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration: GJ-12-BY-9391) used in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act case, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a bond, producing the vehicle as required by court, and maintaining it in original condition until case conclusion. The court relied on the Supreme Court's principle that seized property should not be kept with police for extended periods and ordered return with appropriate safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, ANJAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case