THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJIT MANSHUKH BAROT Advocate - A K KHATRI — 274/2026
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 20th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT100004682026
Filing Number
274/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
274/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993003251494
Police Station
ANJAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AJIT MANSHUKH BAROT Advocate - A K KHATRI
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court discharged the accused under Section 262 of the CrPC, quashing the charge sheet due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case beyond the co-accused's statement, with no corroborating material in the chargesheet. The judgment also criticized police practice of filing "designed FIRs" under the Prohibition Act where accused escape despite prior police intelligence, directing the state to implement monitoring mechanisms to prevent such practices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court discharged the accused under Section 262 of the CrPC, quashing the charge sheet due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case beyond the co-accused's statement, with no corroborating material in the chargesheet. The judgment also criticized police practice of filing "designed FIRs" under the Prohibition Act where accused escape despite prior police intelligence, directing the state to implement monitoring mechanisms to prevent such practices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts