GAJUBHA RAVUBHA JADEJA vs GUJARAT GOVERNMENT THROUGH SACHIV Advocate - AGP — 114/2013
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT100001852013
Filing Number
114/2013
Filing Date
07-05-2013
Registration No
114/2013
Registration Date
07-05-2013
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAJUBHA RAVUBHA JADEJA
Adv. Y.K.POTA
Respondent(s)
GUJARAT GOVERNMENT THROUGH SACHIV Advocate - AGP
COLLECTOR
Adv. AGP
DEPUTY COLLLECTOR
Adv. AGP
TALATI
Adv. AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 13-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 08-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Second Additional Civil Judge at Anjar (Kutch) decided a land ownership dispute (Case No. 114/2013) filed by Gajubha Revabha Jadeja against government officials. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, establishing that Survey No. 785 of Vassamedi village legally belongs to Gajubha and his ancestors, validating their ownership rights based on historical records and mortgage documents dating back to 1977. The court ordered mandatory corrections to revenue records to reflect this rightful ownership and dismissed the contradictory claims of the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Second Additional Civil Judge at Anjar (Kutch) decided a land ownership dispute (Case No. 114/2013) filed by Gajubha Revabha Jadeja against government officials. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, establishing that Survey No. 785 of Vassamedi village legally belongs to Gajubha and his ancestors, validating their ownership rights based on historical records and mortgage documents dating back to 1977. The court ordered mandatory corrections to revenue records to reflect this rightful ownership and dismissed the contradictory claims of the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts