NARAN RAVA KOLI vs PARBAT RAJABHAI PATEL Advocate - B D CHHAYA — 83/2012
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT100000972012
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
83/2012
Filing Date
19-04-2012
Registration No
83/2012
Registration Date
19-04-2012
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NARAN RAVA KOLI
Adv. B.M.DHOLAKIA
Respondent(s)
PARBAT RAJABHAI PATEL Advocate - B D CHHAYA
PREMJI DEVJI PATEL
Adv. B D CHHAYA
SHANKARLAL KANTILAL PATEL
Adv. B D CHHAYA
SHANTILAL KALYANJI PATANIYA
Adv. B.G.BHANSALI
DHIRAJLAL DEVRAM MISTRI
Adv. B.G.BHANSALI
MATHKIYA NAVINCHANDRA MAGANLAL(Legal Heir)
LALCHAND RAJKUMAR THAVARDAS
BHATI KARSHANJI DANSHAGJI
ASHOK VACHARAJ MAHESHWARI
Adv. P D JADEJA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 10-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 30-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: RCS/83/2012 - Regular Civil Suit No. 83 of 2012, Taluka Court at Anjar, Gujarat Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim with costs. The plaintiff (Naran Rava Koli) failed to establish his primary case on record regarding disputed agricultural land ownership and possession rights against four defendants. The court found insufficient evidence on the key issue of whether the plaintiff held valid documentary title and direct possession of the disputed land survey numbers, and rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding boundary demarcation and unauthorized occupation by defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: RCS/83/2012 - Regular Civil Suit No. 83 of 2012, Taluka Court at Anjar, Gujarat Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim with costs. The plaintiff (Naran Rava Koli) failed to establish his primary case on record regarding disputed agricultural land ownership and possession rights against four defendants. The court found insufficient evidence on the key issue of whether the plaintiff held valid documentary title and direct possession of the disputed land survey numbers, and rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding boundary demarcation and unauthorized occupation by defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts