THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RASHPALSINH HARBHAJANLAL MAHAMI Advocate - A R BAROT — 63/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT100000872026
Filing Number
63/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANJAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993003251315
Police Station
ANJAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RASHPALSINH HARBHAJANLAL MAHAMI Advocate - A R BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Raspalsinh Harbhajanlal Mahmi, of charges under BNS Section 281, 132(b) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134 (rash and negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicular accident case. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the dumper truck involved in the accident, as the complainant's evidence lacked independent corroboration and critical details like the vehicle's registration number were not proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-May-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2026
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Raspalsinh Harbhajanlal Mahmi, of charges under BNS Section 281, 132(b) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134 (rash and negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicular accident case. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the dumper truck involved in the accident, as the complainant's evidence lacked independent corroboration and critical details like the vehicle's registration number were not proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts