GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ROHIT CHIMANBHAI SHAH Advocate - H B VAGHELA — 1175/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT090015992025
Filing Number
1175/2025
Filing Date
22-Aug-2025
Registration No
1175/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHACHAU
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993004250672
Police Station
BHACHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROHIT CHIMANBHAI SHAH Advocate - H B VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 223 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant) and sentenced him to imprisonment for 10 days, with a fine of Rs. 1,000 in the alternative. The court considered the accused's plea of guilt, economic hardship, and first-time offence while awarding lenient punishment aligned with principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jan-2026
Copies To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Nov-2025
Copies To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Oct-2025
Copies To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Sep-2025
Copies To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1175/2025
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 223 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant) and sentenced him to imprisonment for 10 days, with a fine of Rs. 1,000 in the alternative. The court considered the accused's plea of guilt, economic hardship, and first-time offence while awarding lenient punishment aligned with principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts