GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JITENDRABHAI LALANBHAI PATHAK — 1137/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT090015412025
Filing Number
1137/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
1137/2025
Registration Date
06-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHACHAU
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993004250196
Police Station
BHACHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JITENDRABHAI LALANBHAI PATHAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Penal Act Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (or five hundred rupees), with an alternative imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied the sentencing principle established in the precedent case, considering the accused's background from a backward area and the nature of the offense to impose a reduced or reformative sentence rather than the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1137/2025
The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Penal Act Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (or five hundred rupees), with an alternative imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied the sentencing principle established in the precedent case, considering the accused's background from a backward area and the nature of the offense to impose a reduced or reformative sentence rather than the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts