GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs FARSHURAM CHANARAM KAPDI — 770/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT090011042025
Filing Number
770/2025
Filing Date
08-Jul-2025
Registration No
770/2025
Registration Date
08-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHACHAU
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993004250170
Police Station
BHACHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.FARSHURAM CHANARAM KAPDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court found the accused guilty under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for possessing and consuming alcohol illegally. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 500 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) after considering mitigating factors including the accused's backward area residence and first-time offence, applying principles of minimum sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 770/2025
The court found the accused guilty under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for possessing and consuming alcohol illegally. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 500 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) after considering mitigating factors including the accused's backward area residence and first-time offence, applying principles of minimum sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts