GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KIRANBHAI MAGANDAS SADHU — 765/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT090010992025
Filing Number
765/2025
Filing Date
08-Jul-2025
Registration No
765/2025
Registration Date
08-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHACHAU
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993004240851
Police Station
BHACHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRANBHAI MAGANDAS SADHU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Bhavnagar Sessions Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested leniency due to poor financial and family circumstances, his first offense, and promise of reformation. The court, considering these mitigating factors and relevant precedents, sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (with 20 days simple imprisonment as default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 765/2025
Summary The Bhavnagar Sessions Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested leniency due to poor financial and family circumstances, his first offense, and promise of reformation. The court, considering these mitigating factors and relevant precedents, sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (with 20 days simple imprisonment as default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts