GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BHARAT VALABHAI KOLI Advocate - S I NAREJA — 172/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,352,351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT090002592025
Filing Number
172/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
172/2025
Registration Date
11-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHACHAU
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993004240608
Police Station
BHACHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHARAT VALABHAI KOLI Advocate - S I NAREJA
PRABHUBHAI RASANGBHAI KOLI
HARESHBHAI RAMABHAI KOLI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 24-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Bhachau, Kutch, acquitted three defendants (Bhartbhai Valabhai Koli, Prabhubhai Rasangbhai Koli, and Hareshbhai Ramabhai Koli) of charges under IPC Sections 74, 342, 341(2), 44, and GPS Act Section 135. The court found that while the complainant and her husband testified to the alleged incident of abduction and threats, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient corroborating evidence linking the accused to the crimes beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding documents and circumstantial evidence that could not definitively prove the accused committed the alleged offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Bhachau, Kutch, acquitted three defendants (Bhartbhai Valabhai Koli, Prabhubhai Rasangbhai Koli, and Hareshbhai Ramabhai Koli) of charges under IPC Sections 74, 342, 341(2), 44, and GPS Act Section 135. The court found that while the complainant and her husband testified to the alleged incident of abduction and threats, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient corroborating evidence linking the accused to the crimes beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding documents and circumstantial evidence that could not definitively prove the accused committed the alleged offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts