Government of Gujarat vs ARVINDSINH RANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N A GARVA — 1378/2024

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116(B),81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT080019842024

Filing Number

1378/2024

Filing Date

23-Dec-2024

Registration No

1378/2024

Registration Date

23-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, RAPAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993015240038

Police Station

BALASAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116(B),81,98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARVINDSINH RANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N A GARVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Arvind Singh Ranu Bha Jadeja, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), 116B, 81, 98(2) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness testimony came from biased police witnesses with vested interests, and no independent witnesses supported the case. The court held that the burden of proof rests on the prosecution, and where doubt exists, the benefit must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 16-Jun-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 28-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 22-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 23-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1378/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Arvind Singh Ranu Bha Jadeja, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), 116B, 81, 98(2) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness testimony came from biased police witnesses with vested interests, and no independent witnesses supported the case. The court held that the burden of proof rests on the prosecution, and where doubt exists, the benefit must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case