Government of Gujarat vs ARVINDSINH RANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N A GARVA — 1378/2024
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116(B),81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT080019842024
Filing Number
1378/2024
Filing Date
23-Dec-2024
Registration No
1378/2024
Registration Date
23-Dec-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, RAPAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993015240038
Police Station
BALASAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARVINDSINH RANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N A GARVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Arvind Singh Ranu Bha Jadeja, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), 116B, 81, 98(2) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness testimony came from biased police witnesses with vested interests, and no independent witnesses supported the case. The court held that the burden of proof rests on the prosecution, and where doubt exists, the benefit must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jun-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1378/2024
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Arvind Singh Ranu Bha Jadeja, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), 116B, 81, 98(2) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness testimony came from biased police witnesses with vested interests, and no independent witnesses supported the case. The court held that the burden of proof rests on the prosecution, and where doubt exists, the benefit must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts