Government of Gujarat vs RAMDEVSINH UDUBHA JADEJA Advocate - M D GADHAVI — 1395/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 19th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT080017672025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1395/2025

Filing Date

06-11-2025

Registration No

1395/2025

Registration Date

06-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, RAPAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993010250160

Police Station

RAHPAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAMDEVSINH UDUBHA JADEJA Advocate - M D GADHAVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

19-05-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

28-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

03-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

19-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused, Ramdeo Singh Udubahjadeja, of charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession of the contraband seized. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical witness testimonies were incomplete and key procedural safeguards were not properly followed during the investigation and evidence collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Ramdeo Singh Udubahjadeja, of charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive and conscious possession of the contraband seized. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical witness testimonies were incomplete and key procedural safeguards were not properly followed during the investigation and evidence collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, RAPAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case