BABUBHAI HIRJIBHAI SUTHAR(LUHAR) vs LT. BHAPA NANJI DEVA HEIRS Advocate - R R CHANDE — 1/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,35. Disposed: Contested--DISMISS WITH NO ORDER TO COST on 09th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJKT080005492022
Filing Number
1/2022
Filing Date
20-06-2022
Registration No
1/2022
Registration Date
20-06-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, RAPAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISS WITH NO ORDER TO COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BABUBHAI HIRJIBHAI SUTHAR(LUHAR)
Adv. G B VYAS
Respondent(s)
LT. BHAPA NANJI DEVA HEIRS Advocate - R R CHANDE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
| 23-03-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court partially granted the execution petition filed by the decree holder (plaintiff). The court confirmed that the plaintiff has possession and ownership rights over the property (house no. 14/3 in Rapar municipality) and the adjoining courtyard, and that the defendants have no legal right over it. The court ordered the defendants to vacate and restore possession within 60 days, directed them not to obstruct the plaintiff's access to the property, and imposed one month imprisonment for contempt of court for violating earlier orders. However, the court dismissed the remaining claims as being beyond the scope of execution proceedings, awarding no additional relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court partially granted the execution petition filed by the decree holder (plaintiff). The court confirmed that the plaintiff has possession and ownership rights over the property (house no. 14/3 in Rapar municipality) and the adjoining courtyard, and that the defendants have no legal right over it. The court ordered the defendants to vacate and restore possession within 60 days, directed them not to obstruct the plaintiff's access to the property, and imposed one month imprisonment for contempt of court for violating earlier orders. However, the court dismissed the remaining claims as being beyond the scope of execution proceedings, awarding no additional relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts