GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KAMLESH RAJENDRA JOSHI Advocate - R G JAYPAL — 1572/2024

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 23rd March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT070019802024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1572/2024

Filing Date

22-11-2024

Registration No

1572/2024

Registration Date

22-11-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

1221

Police Station

NAKHATRANA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 [SECTION 1 18] Section 12

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KAMLESH RAJENDRA JOSHI Advocate - R G JAYPAL

MAHENDRA KAYA BUCHIYA

MEHULNATH DAYANATH GOSWAMI

NANJEE KAYA BUCHIYA

ADHREMAN HUSEN NODE

ISMAIL ADHREMAN KUMBHAR

ALPESH VINOD VALAND

DHANGAR DAMGAR GOSWAMI

PETHUBHA HARBHAMJEE JADEJA

RATILAL @ RATO KANJEE PAYAN

GULAM ABDULLA NODE

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

25-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

23-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nakhatrana-Kutch acquitted two defendants (Mehendra Kaya Buchiya and Naanji Kaya Buchiya) charged under the Gambling Act, Section 12, finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the gambling charges beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged evidence of seized cash and mobile phones totaling ₹1,66,500, it determined that the corroborating witness testimony from panchas (independent witnesses) was insufficient to establish the case, as the panchas did not substantively support the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nakhatrana-Kutch acquitted two defendants (Mehendra Kaya Buchiya and Naanji Kaya Buchiya) charged under the Gambling Act, Section 12, finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the gambling charges beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged evidence of seized cash and mobile phones totaling ₹1,66,500, it determined that the corroborating witness testimony from panchas (independent witnesses) was insufficient to establish the case, as the panchas did not substantively support the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case