GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KAMLESH RAJENDRA JOSHI Advocate - R G JAYPAL — 1572/2024
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT070019802024
Filing Number
1572/2024
Filing Date
22-11-2024
Registration No
1572/2024
Registration Date
22-11-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
1221
Police Station
NAKHATRANA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KAMLESH RAJENDRA JOSHI Advocate - R G JAYPAL
MAHENDRA KAYA BUCHIYA
MEHULNATH DAYANATH GOSWAMI
NANJEE KAYA BUCHIYA
ADHREMAN HUSEN NODE
ISMAIL ADHREMAN KUMBHAR
ALPESH VINOD VALAND
DHANGAR DAMGAR GOSWAMI
PETHUBHA HARBHAMJEE JADEJA
RATILAL @ RATO KANJEE PAYAN
GULAM ABDULLA NODE
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 23-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nakhatrana-Kutch acquitted two defendants (Mehendra Kaya Buchiya and Naanji Kaya Buchiya) charged under the Gambling Act, Section 12, finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the gambling charges beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged evidence of seized cash and mobile phones totaling ₹1,66,500, it determined that the corroborating witness testimony from panchas (independent witnesses) was insufficient to establish the case, as the panchas did not substantively support the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nakhatrana-Kutch acquitted two defendants (Mehendra Kaya Buchiya and Naanji Kaya Buchiya) charged under the Gambling Act, Section 12, finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the gambling charges beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged evidence of seized cash and mobile phones totaling ₹1,66,500, it determined that the corroborating witness testimony from panchas (independent witnesses) was insufficient to establish the case, as the panchas did not substantively support the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts