GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ISHAK HAJI CHAVAN Advocate - A H GUNSAI — 936/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 106(1),281,125(A),125(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT070011792025
Filing Number
936/2025
Filing Date
18-07-2025
Registration No
936/2025
Registration Date
18-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205035250372
Police Station
NAKHATRANA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ISHAK HAJI CHAVAN Advocate - A H GUNSAI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
HEARING
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Nakhtrrana Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Ishak Haji Chavan of charges under IPC sections 106(1), 281, 125(a), 125(b) and Motor Vehicle Act sections 177, 184, 134 in a fatal road accident case. The court found that while the prosecution presented witness testimony about a collision between a motorcycle and a bolero pickup truck that resulted in a death on 21/04/2025, no witness directly observed the accident, and the evidence lacked sufficient clarity regarding the accused's recklessness or negligence. The court applied the principle that criminal charges must be proven beyond reasonable doubt with clear and convincing evidence, and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Nakhtrrana Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Ishak Haji Chavan of charges under IPC sections 106(1), 281, 125(a), 125(b) and Motor Vehicle Act sections 177, 184, 134 in a fatal road accident case. The court found that while the prosecution presented witness testimony about a collision between a motorcycle and a bolero pickup truck that resulted in a death on 21/04/2025, no witness directly observed the accident, and the evidence lacked sufficient clarity regarding the accused's recklessness or negligence. The court applied the principle that criminal charges must be proven beyond reasonable doubt with clear and convincing evidence, and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts