PUNIT MOHANLAL NATHANI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 50/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT070007112026

Filing Number

50/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

50/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNIT MOHANLAL NATHANI

    Adv. K S DHANANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 50/2026 Summary: The court allowed Punit Mohanlal Nathani's application to release Rs. 12,791 frozen in an IndusInd Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. Since no FIR was filed and the Cyber Crime Police opined the amount should be returned, the court ordered the funds transferred to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing a surety bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to potential claims by other interested parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 50/2026 Summary: The court allowed Punit Mohanlal Nathani's application to release Rs. 12,791 frozen in an IndusInd Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. Since no FIR was filed and the Cyber Crime Police opined the amount should be returned, the court ordered the funds transferred to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing a surety bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, subject to potential claims by other interested parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case