GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JUVANSINH HATHUBHA JADEJA Advocate - V R GADHVI — 547/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296B,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT070006962025
Filing Number
547/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
547/2025
Registration Date
23-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205035241123
Police Station
NAKHATRANA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JUVANSINH HATHUBHA JADEJA Advocate - V R GADHVI
RATANJI DESHARJI JADEJA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
HEARING
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Juvansimh Hatubha Jadeja and Ratnji Desrji Jadeja) of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), and 54. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had assaulted the complainant, caused injuries, or made threatening remarks, as the complainant and witnesses contradicted the allegations in their testimony and retracted their complaints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Juvansimh Hatubha Jadeja and Ratnji Desrji Jadeja) of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), and 54. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had assaulted the complainant, caused injuries, or made threatening remarks, as the complainant and witnesses contradicted the allegations in their testimony and retracted their complaints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts