BHIBHAJI VAGHAJI JADEJA(Legal Heir) vs SHAMBUDAN SANKARDAN GADHAVI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE GADHAVI LAXMIBEN SHANKARDAN Advocate - V R GADHVI — 2/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,38,10. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT070002702023
Filing Number
2/2023
Filing Date
18-Jan-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
18-Jan-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHIBHAJI VAGHAJI JADEJA(Legal Heir)
Adv. D M JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAMBUDAN SANKARDAN GADHAVI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE GADHAVI LAXMIBEN SHANKARDAN Advocate - V R GADHVI
-
2.PUSHPABEN W/O SHABHUDAN GADHVI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE GADHAVI LAXMIBEN SHANKARDAN
Adv. V R GADHVI
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Defendant Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Defendant Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Defendant Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jan-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary In Regular Civil Suit No. 2 of 2023, the court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 17/01/2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he could not adequately prove the agreement to sell, possession of the property, or his readiness to perform his obligations. The court determined that the balance of convenience was not in the plaintiff's favor and no irreparable injury would result from denying the injunction. The parties were directed to cooperate in expeditious trial of the main suit with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Dec-2023
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Oct-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Aug-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jul-2023
OrderView PDF
-
21-Jul-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jun-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Apr-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2023
Summary In Regular Civil Suit No. 2 of 2023, the court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 17/01/2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he could not adequately prove the agreement to sell, possession of the property, or his readiness to perform his obligations. The court determined that the balance of convenience was not in the plaintiff's favor and no irreparable injury would result from denying the injunction. The parties were directed to cooperate in expeditious trial of the main suit with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts