GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAJIV HARKARANRAM NETRA Advocate - A H GUNSAI — 112/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT070001262026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA
Judge
6-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205035230004
Police Station
NAKHATRANA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJIV HARKARANRAM NETRA Advocate - A H GUNSAI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Rajiv Harkarnaraam Netra of charges under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185 and Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b), finding insufficient evidence that he drove under the influence of alcohol. The court noted that witness testimonies lacked consistency and independent corroboration, and no proper medical examination or blood test was conducted to establish intoxication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Rajiv Harkarnaraam Netra of charges under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185 and Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b), finding insufficient evidence that he drove under the influence of alcohol. The court noted that witness testimonies lacked consistency and independent corroboration, and no proper medical examination or blood test was conducted to establish intoxication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts