Government of Gujarat vs RAJUKUMAR UMESHKUMAR YADAV — 103/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT070001112021

Case disposed

Filing Number

103/2021

Filing Date

15-01-2021

Registration No

103/2021

Registration Date

15-01-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205035200047

Police Station

NAKHATRANA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,338
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJUKUMAR UMESHKUMAR YADAV

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

18-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

08-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted defendant Rajkumar Umeshkumar Yadav of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and MV Act sections 177, 184 related to a traffic accident. The judge found that while the complainant's testimony established a collision between a trailer and motorcycle occurred on 29/01/2020, the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was the negligent driver, as the complainant could not identify the trailer operator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted defendant Rajkumar Umeshkumar Yadav of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and MV Act sections 177, 184 related to a traffic accident. The judge found that while the complainant's testimony established a collision between a trailer and motorcycle occurred on 29/01/2020, the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was the negligent driver, as the complainant could not identify the trailer operator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case