VIRBAI AAIDAN GADHVI vs DALPATRAM KANJI JOSHI Advocate - D M JADEJA — 31/2009
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,39. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR WANT PROSECUTION on 08th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT070000312009
Filing Number
31/2009
Filing Date
28-01-2009
Registration No
31/2009
Registration Date
28-01-2009
Court
TALUKA COURT, NAKHATRANA
Judge
6-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR WANT PROSECUTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIRBAI AAIDAN GADHVI
Adv. J K CHINARANA
Respondent(s)
DALPATRAM KANJI JOSHI Advocate - D M JADEJA
VASTA BHARMAL GADHVI
Adv. J K CHINARANA
KIRTIKUMAR KHANJI GADHVI
JETHALAL VALJI NAKRANI
Adv. A R LIMBANI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 18-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 02-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 31/2009 – Dismissal for Default The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking cancellation of a sale-deed and permanent injunction after the plaintiff repeatedly failed to appear for cross-examination despite the issues being framed in 2017 and affidavit of evidence filed in 2019. The Additional Civil Judge found the plaintiff negligent and disastrously defaulted in prosecution, dismissing the case for want of evidence under Order-17, Rule-02 read with Order-09 of the CPC, 1908. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 31/2009 – Dismissal for Default The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking cancellation of a sale-deed and permanent injunction after the plaintiff repeatedly failed to appear for cross-examination despite the issues being framed in 2017 and affidavit of evidence filed in 2019. The Additional Civil Judge found the plaintiff negligent and disastrously defaulted in prosecution, dismissing the case for want of evidence under Order-17, Rule-02 read with Order-09 of the CPC, 1908. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts