KHIMJIBHAI GABHABHAI KANAR vs LILABEN KAYLANJI KANNAR Advocate - S A RAYMA — 44/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Defendant Evidence Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT040016152021

Filing Number

44/2021

Filing Date

08-Jul-2021

Registration No

44/2021

Registration Date

08-Jul-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHIMJIBHAI GABHABHAI KANAR

    Adv. V K SONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LILABEN KAYLANJI KANNAR Advocate - S A RAYMA

  2. 2.RAJNIKANT KALYANJI DEDHIYA

    Adv. S A RAYMA

  3. 3.MINABEN KAYLANJI W/O NAVIN SANJOT

    Adv. S A RAYMA

  4. 4.BHAVESH GIRIJASANKAR DAVE

    Adv. A H VYAS

  5. 5.ASHOK KALYANJI KANNAR

    Adv. S.A.RAYMA

  6. 6.ARVIND KALYANJI KANNAR(Legal Heir)

    Adv. S.A.RAYMA

  7. 7.PARITA ARVIND KANNAR

    Adv. S A RAYMA

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 17-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 06-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 02-May-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 18-Apr-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 20-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 05-Feb-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 16-Jan-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 18-Dec-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 23-Oct-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 17-Oct-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 08-Aug-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 11-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 26-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 01-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 14-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 18-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 21-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 22-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 12-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 31-Aug-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 27-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 15-Jun-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 12-Apr-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 23-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 11-Jan-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 30-Nov-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 29-Sep-2022

    Evidence Of Appellant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 17-Aug-2022

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 29-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 13-Apr-2022

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 23-Feb-2022

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for an interim order during a pending civil suit over agricultural land ownership (Regular Civil Suit No. 44/2021). The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in their favor, and could not demonstrate irreparable injury if the interim order were denied. Consequently, the application for interim relief was rejected, and the suit was left to proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  46. 23-Feb-2022

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 27-Jan-2022

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 23-Dec-2021

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 18-Dec-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 16-Dec-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 18-Nov-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 27-Oct-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 23-Sep-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 26-Aug-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 18-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 08-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for an interim order during a pending civil suit over agricultural land ownership (Regular Civil Suit No. 44/2021). The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in their favor, and could not demonstrate irreparable injury if the interim order were denied. Consequently, the application for interim relief was rejected, and the suit was left to proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case