THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MEHULSINH URFE MANOJSINH CHANDUBHA ZALA — 1147/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT040015462025
Filing Number
1147/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
1147/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDVI
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
88
Police Station
MANDVI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MEHULSINH URFE MANOJSINH CHANDUBHA ZALA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 24-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused, Mehulsinh (alias Manojsinh Chandubha Jhala), under the Prohibition Act sections 61(1) and IPC sections 185, 3, and 181, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 1,200 with simple imprisonment of 2 days as default punishment, and ordered custody of the seized vehicle to be returned to its rightful owner after proper verification. The judgment was based on the accused's voluntary confession and first-time offense status, which the court considered as mitigating circumstances while imposing the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused, Mehulsinh (alias Manojsinh Chandubha Jhala), under the Prohibition Act sections 61(1) and IPC sections 185, 3, and 181, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 1,200 with simple imprisonment of 2 days as default punishment, and ordered custody of the seized vehicle to be returned to its rightful owner after proper verification. The judgment was based on the accused's voluntary confession and first-time offense status, which the court considered as mitigating circumstances while imposing the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts