SAJUBHA PANCHUBHA JADEJA vs VADILAL DUNGARSHIH SHAH Advocate - V V MAHESHWARI — 38/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Defendant Evidence Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT040011502021

Filing Number

38/2021

Filing Date

15-Jun-2021

Registration No

38/2021

Registration Date

15-Jun-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAJUBHA PANCHUBHA JADEJA

    Adv. K S VASANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VADILAL DUNGARSHIH SHAH Advocate - V V MAHESHWARI

  2. 2.RUKHMANIBEN D/O DUNGARSHI SHAH

    Adv. V V MAHESHWARI

  3. 3.VIMLABEN D/O DUNGARSHIH SHAH W/O VASANTLAL DEDHIYA

    Adv. V V MAHESHWARI

  4. 4.MINABEN D/O DUGARSHIH SHAH W/O DHIRAJLAL SHAH

    Adv. V V MAHESHWARI

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 01-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 30-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 25-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 28-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 30-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 02-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 23-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 13-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 09-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 28-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 26-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 22-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 18-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 26-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 13-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 24-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 13-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 02-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 27-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 10-Aug-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 13-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 07-Jun-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 23-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 02-Feb-2023

    OrderView PDF

    Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from selling the suit property. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the sale deed was a mortgage transfer (not absolute sale), defendants were legally entered in revenue records, and the plaintiff sought injunction against hypothetical future acts rather than actual harm. Costs shall be borne by the plaintiff in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 02-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 19-Jan-2023

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 21-Dec-2022

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 23-Nov-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 13-Oct-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 08-Sep-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 21-Jul-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 22-Jun-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 07-Apr-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 24-Feb-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 06-Jan-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 25-Nov-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 06-Oct-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 26-Aug-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 07-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 15-Jun-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from selling the suit property. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the sale deed was a mortgage transfer (not absolute sale), defendants were legally entered in revenue records, and the plaintiff sought injunction against hypothetical future acts rather than actual harm. Costs shall be borne by the plaintiff in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case