THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAJAK FAKIRMAMAD SUMBHAR — 502/2026

Case under Bombay Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 11th July 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT040006592026

Filing Number

502/2026

Filing Date

16-May-2026

Registration No

502/2026

Registration Date

16-May-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

2-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

11-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

194

Police Station

MANDVI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJAK FAKIRMAMAD SUMBHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jul-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 502/2026 The Additional Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Rajak Fakirmamad Sumbhar under IPC Section 135, accepting his plea of guilty. Considering it as the accused's first offense with no criminal history, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹100 with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment, exercising discretion to award punishment below the statutory minimum as permitted under relevant precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  6. 26-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  7. 16-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 502/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 502/2026 The Additional Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Rajak Fakirmamad Sumbhar under IPC Section 135, accepting his plea of guilty. Considering it as the accused's first offense with no criminal history, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹100 with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment, exercising discretion to award punishment below the statutory minimum as permitted under relevant precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case