BUDHBHATI VANITABEN JETHALAL vs RAJGOR PRAFUL VISHANJI Advocate - K S NEGI — 27/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT040005822023
Filing Number
27/2023
Filing Date
28-Mar-2023
Registration No
27/2023
Registration Date
28-Mar-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDVI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BUDHBHATI VANITABEN JETHALAL
Adv. K N RAG
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJGOR PRAFUL VISHANJI Advocate - K S NEGI
-
2.TALATI SHAH MANTRI
Adv. H B RAYAMA
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Apr-2024
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for an interim stay order, finding they failed to establish a prima facie case. The defendants' unauthorized construction on the disputed property and subsequent land-grabbing activities were found to be unlawful, but the plaintiffs could not demonstrate a balance of convenience in their favor, as proper legal remedies remained available through the ongoing land demarcation proceedings before the village panchayat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2024
Issues
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Mar-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Nov-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Aug-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jul-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jun-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2023
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for an interim stay order, finding they failed to establish a prima facie case. The defendants' unauthorized construction on the disputed property and subsequent land-grabbing activities were found to be unlawful, but the plaintiffs could not demonstrate a balance of convenience in their favor, as proper legal remedies remained available through the ongoing land demarcation proceedings before the village panchayat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts