BUDHBHATI VANITABEN JETHALAL vs RAJGOR PRAFUL VISHANJI Advocate - K S NEGI — 27/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT040005822023

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

27/2023

Filing Date

28-03-2023

Registration No

27/2023

Registration Date

28-03-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

BUDHBHATI VANITABEN JETHALAL

Adv. K N RAG

Respondent(s)

RAJGOR PRAFUL VISHANJI Advocate - K S NEGI

TALATI SHAH MANTRI

Adv. H B RAYAMA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

15-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

18-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

01-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

02-04-2024
ORDER

Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for an interim stay order, finding they failed to establish a prima facie case. The defendants' unauthorized construction on the disputed property and subsequent land-grabbing activities were found to be unlawful, but the plaintiffs could not demonstrate a balance of convenience in their favor, as proper legal remedies remained available through the ongoing land demarcation proceedings before the village panchayat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for an interim stay order, finding they failed to establish a prima facie case. The defendants' unauthorized construction on the disputed property and subsequent land-grabbing activities were found to be unlawful, but the plaintiffs could not demonstrate a balance of convenience in their favor, as proper legal remedies remained available through the ongoing land demarcation proceedings before the village panchayat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case